Mutton, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). In the event the I am not saying gorgeous, could you be sexy or otherwise not?: Physical-attractiveness feedback and you can matchmaking preferences just like the a purpose of a person’s very own appeal. Emotional Science, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in-marriage and other personal relationships. From inside how to meet chubby sexy single women the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of aspiration. Into the J. McV. Search (Ed.), Personality as well as the behavior problems (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Force. [ Links ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Anticipating relationships relationship fate which have insiders’ and you may outsiders’ position: Which and what is asked issues. Personal Relationship, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship top quality during the newly wedded couples: One or two created means. Journal regarding Personality and you will Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]
Legitimizing affairs on the initiation regarding heterosexual dating
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A good. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. R. (2006). Understood resemblance and you can dating achievement among matchmaking lovers: A keen idiographic strategy. Diary off Societal and private Relationship, 23, 865-880. [ Links ]
Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, A beneficial. (2006). Internet dating. Arizona, DC: Statement into Pew Internet & Western Lifestyle Project. Recovered , off [ Links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Assessing the precision off predictions on the relationship relationship: Just how and why create lovers’ forecasts change from people from perceiver? Identification and you can Personal Mindset Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Website links ]
The brand new interest-similarity hypothesis one of get across-intercourse friends: Relationships pleasure, perceived parallels, and you may thinking-offering attitudes
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Papers exhibited on Earliest Globally Fulfilling for the Individual Relationships, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Merkle, E.R., & Richardson, R.A beneficial. (2000). Electronic dating and you can digital relating: Conceptualizing pc mediated romantic relationship. Family, forty-two, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is real resemblance very important to appeal? An excellent meta-study of actual and you can thought of resemblance. Diary out-of Public and personal Relationship, 25, 889-922. [ Links ]
Morry, Yards. Meters. (2005). Matchmaking satisfaction just like the a predictor from resemblance ratings; A test of attraction-resemblance hypothesis. Log off Public and private Relationships, 22, 561-584. [ Website links ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you may expansion of one’s SVR principle out-of dyadic combining. Record out-of ily, 44, 929-947. [ Links ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can divorce case: A great 14-season longitudinal examination of black colored couples and you can white couples. Log from Personal and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). The new like formula Matches thinks it’s got found an algorithm to possess governing the web based relationship company: A scientific strategy for finding Mr. or Ms. Right. Organization 2.0 Mag. Retrieved on from [ Backlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Identification parallels when you look at the lovers. Identification and you may Personal Variations, 45, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Spouse tastes: Exactly what features would individuals notice within small-name intimate and enough time-name close partners? Diary out of Psychology and you will Individual Sex, twelve, 1-21. [ Website links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The newest role of your own mind from the initiation and you can course of public telecommunications. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict relationship (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]